what are the essential arguemnts of the lawyers boleyn and stevenson in the debate over the equitable nature of the death penalty? what are the merits and problems of these arguments?

Respuesta :

Boleyn and Stevenson concentrate on the death's inhumanity, lack of deterrence, persisted racial and economic biases, and irreversibility in their arguments regarding the equitable nature of the death penalty.

What is the point of Lawyer Stevenson regarding human nature?

Stevenson talks about the dual essence of human nature, the notion that every person possesses both good and evil. Every person has a good and a bad side, but how you act and the choices you make are what counts, according to Stevenson. The argument that society has a moral duty to protect its members' safety and well-being is commonly used to defend the death sentence. Murderers put this security and well-being in peril. Society can only guarantee that convicted killers won't kill again by putting them to death.

The death penalty is cruel, inhumane, and humiliating. A bigger portion of civilized society consistently opposes the death sentence, regardless of the accuser, the crime, the accused's guilt or innocence, or the execution method. Stevenson claimed that this was demonstrated.

To know more about, death penalty, visit :

brainly.com/question/732147

#SPJ4