Respuesta :
There is convincing evidence that the subjects' health would be compromised by inclusion. It is not appropriate to consistently prohibit women with reproductive potential from clinical studies.
When a party has the burden of proving a claim or defense, they must do it with clear and convincing evidence, which means they must provide proof that leaves you with a strong conviction that the claim's or defense's factual contentions are accurate. Instead of merely demonstrating that something is more likely than not, convincing evidence demonstrates that there is a strong likelihood that a statement is accurate. In California personal injury cases where the plaintiff asks for punitive damages in addition to compensatory damages, this standard is frequently applied. In Colorado v. New Mexico, 467 U.S. 310 (1984), the Supreme Court defined "clear and convincing" as meaning that the evidence had a strong and significant greater probability of being true than false. The fact finder must, in other words, be persuaded that the claim is very likely.
Learn more about convincing evidence here
https://brainly.com/question/3406488
#SPJ4
