Inference shows that when the article was written, the option that had NOT YET happened was "All of the oil in the Gulf from the 2010 oil spill was cleaned up. (Option B)
What is the textual evidence that supports the above?
Samantha's report is the evidence for the answer above. See the same below:
"Yet Samantha Joye, a marine scientist, disagreed. She conducted a study of the sea floor. She found that the bacteria had cleaned only 10 percent of the oil. She reported that the Gulf would take many years to recover.
Hence, it is correct to state that When the article was written, the option that had NOT YET happened was "All of the oil in the Gulf from the 2010 oil spill was cleaned up.
Learn more about inference:
https://brainly.com/question/25913650
#SPJ1
Full Question:
In April 2010, an oil rig exploded in the Gulf of Mexico. Millions of gallons of oil leaked into the Gulf, devastating wildlife. Scientists tried to clean up the spill in a variety of ways. One approach involved the use of oil-eating bacteria. However, scientists were divided on its effectiveness. Some maintained that the bacteria were "fairly fast" in cleaning the spill. Officials reported that the Gulf would make a full recovery by 2012. Yet Samantha Joye, a marine scientist, disagreed. She conducted a study of the sea floor. She found that the bacteria had cleaned only 10 percent of the oil. She reported that the Gulf would take many years to recover.
Which of these had not yet happened when this article
was written?
A. A scientist from the University of Georgia studied
the sea floor.
B. All of the oil in the Gulf from the 2010 oil spill was
cleaned up.
C. The NOAA announced plans to restore the Gulf to
the way it was.
D. Scientists said that oil-eating microbes were.
