The owners of the property claimed the city had violated the Fifth Amendment's takings clause, which forbade the government from seizing private property without just compensation for public use.
The U.S. Supreme Court concluded in Kelo v. City of New London that New London could acquire privately owned lands for private development as part of its economic revitalization strategy.
The rationality of this project was The property owners contended that the city had violated the Amendment's takings provision, which guarantees that the government will not take private property for public use without just compensation.
Learn more about Kelo v. City of New London:
https://brainly.com/question/10992257
#SPJ1
Answer:
The rationale for the project was to revitalize the local economy.
Explanation:
Edmentum/Plato answer
