contestada

The Tinker v. Des Moines Supreme Court case concerned two students who wore black armbands to school to protest the Vietnam War. The school district suspended the students, possibly violating their right to free speech.
Which best summarizes the dissenting opinion?

A. Schools have reserved the right to limit expression in past cases and the armbands were, indeed, disruptive
B. Because the armbands protested the Vietnam War, the lawsuit was actually a question of second amendment rights
C. It was proven that other students were allowed to wear controversial symbols, so their suspension was unconstitutional
D. The Des Moines Supreme Court had already ruled in favor of the school to suspend the students

Respuesta :

The statement best summarizes the dissenting opinion, It was proven that other students were allowed to wear controversial symbols, so their suspension was unconstitutional. Thus, the correct answer is C.

What was the case of Tinker v. Des Moines Supreme Court?

This case highlights the act of freedom of speech. In this case, students wear black bands in schools to protest against the Vietnam war.

The school took strict action against the students who got involved in this act. Students went to the supreme court for the action taken by schools where the supreme court interfere in the matter.

Supreme court states that It was proven that other students were allowed to wear controversial symbols, so their suspension was unconstitutional.

This is due to the fact that everyone was permitted to wear black armbands in remembrance of the loss of school spirit the year before the tragedy.

Learn more about Tinker v. Des Moines Supreme Court, here:

https://brainly.com/question/14849904

#SPJ1