The difference between normative reasoning and empirical reasoning is very similar to the difference between _____ and _____.

Select one:

a.
logical inconsistencies ... contradictions


b.
perfect duties ... imperfect duties


c.
act utilitarianism ... rule utilitarianism


d.
a priori reasoning ... a posteriori reasoning

Respuesta :

Answer:

D

Explanation:

One is an input to the other

The difference between normative reasoning and empirical reasoning is very similar to the difference between logical inconsistencies and contradictions.

Each new learner wants to do what others do. Interestingly, this preference extends to others' behavior is Normative reasoning.

Empirical reasoning to refer to the reasoning involved in acquiring this type of knowledge that is, to any instance of reasoning in which the premises are justified directly by observation.

Logical inconsistencies are statements that contradict each other. Logical inconsistencies are thoughts, arguments, or reasoning that are not consistent.

The act of contradicting  gainsaying or opposition. Assertion of the contrary or opposite.

To learn more about Reasoning refer :

https://brainly.com/question/25175983

#SPJ10