pybrothepyro4
contestada

Which of the following is a key difference between the cases of Gutter v. Bollinger and Hernandez v. Texas?

Pete Hernandez committed a crime, and Barbara Grutter was innocent.
Barbara Grutter was a woman, and Pete Hernandez was a man.
Grutter v. Bollinger upheld exclusion to promote diversity, while Hernandez v. Texas denounced exclusion to promote diversity.
Grutter v. Bollinger upheld inclusion to promote diversity, while Hernandez v. Texas denounced inclusion to promote diversity.

Respuesta :

Answer:

Grutter v. Bollinger upheld inclusion to promote diversity, while Hernandez v. Texas denounced inclusion to promote diversity

Explanation:

Grutter v .Bollinger and Hermandez v.Texas both were legendary philosophers the world history ever had.

  • They have contributed a lot to world especially for the diversity sector

Option D is correct

Answer:

[tex]\tiny \tt \color{blue}{grutter \: v}[/tex]

Otras preguntas