Unfortunately, saving elephants had a negative economic effect on some people. In 1999, in response to pressure from business
interests that were losing money because of the ban on the ivory trade, CITES allowed limited trade in stockpiled tusks. Ivory that
already had been harvested from elephants could once again be bought and sold. But disaster for the African elephant followed.
Poachers, or illegal hunters, rushed to kill more elephants. Many people had foreseen that illegal trading of ivory would flourish again if
any trading at all were allowed. Following the CITES decision, African clephants died in large numbers. A 2014 New York Times
editorial reported that approximately 30,000 to 35,000 African elephants were killed each year. Only a complete ban of the ivory trade
can save the African clephant from extinction.
Which type of logical fallacy appears in this excerpt?

Elephants with no or small tusks survive to reproduce and pass on their trait because they are not poached Natural selection so it has changed overtime.

What doyou understand by Natural selection?

Natural selection is the interaction through which populaces of living life forms adjust and change. People in a populace are naturally factor, implying that they are largely disparate here and there.

This variety implies that a few people have characteristics more qualified to the climate than others.

Natural selection is the interaction in nature by which life forms better adjusted to their current circumstance will generally get by and replicate more than those less adjusted to their current circumstance.

For more information about Natural selection, refer the following link:

https://brainly.com/question/9830102

#SPJ1