Which of the following is the BEST conclusion for a persuasive essay? A. Cell phones are really important. They help people communicate a lot. There is evidence that states that people under eighteen might be hurt by them. That's why people should pass a law that says minors can't have cell phones. B. While cell phones provide many substantial benefits to society, like any technological development, they bring risks along with rewards. Concerns about the long-term effects of cell-phone use on children are serious enough to merit laws that restrict cell-phone use by people under eighteen." C. A final reason to keep cell phones from minors is that they don't really need them. As my mom always says, in her day they didn't have cell phones anyway, so why do we think we need them? You can always use the phone in the office at school to call your parents if you need them. And that will save you lots of money. D. As the thesis of this paper stated, cell phones provide great benefits to society by allowing for improved communication, especially in emergencies. However, you can see by my brother's experience that they can also be harmful to people younger than eighteen. That's why I think we need to support laws that prevent kids from having them.
The answer is B. It brings up that there are good things when it comes to cell phones, but it brings up non personal reasons which holds more merit. The rest holds more informal fallacies than B, and they seem to attack the brother more than the cell phones themselves.
Here, most appropriate answer out of all the options would be: "While cell phones provide many substantial benefits to society, like any technological development, they bring risks along with rewards. Concerns about the long-term effects of cell-phone use on children are serious enough to merit laws that restrict cell-phone use by people under eighteen"
