shortly after the 2008 election, president obama appointed outspoken and controversial house member rahm emanuel to lead his white house as chief of staff. the selection drew criticism from republican leaders, including house minority leader john boehner, who remarked that the selection "is an ironic choice for a president-elect who has promised to change washington, make politics more civil, and govern from the center." which of the following explains how congress could legitimately respond to the appointment?

Question

contestada

Respuesta :

mcarc09 mcarc09 · Answer 1 · 2021-11-08T13:41:09+01:00

After reading the passage and taking into consideration what each branch of government can do, we can say:

- Members of Congress could issue statements opposing the appointment, but they have no formal power to block it.

In general, presidential appointees must be confirmed by members of the Senate.

However, this case refers to the Congress and the chief of staff of the president.

The Congress is not the one supposed to confirm presidential appointees.

And, in any case, the chief of staff does not need confirmation, even from the Senate.

Therefore, members of the Congress can voice their opinion. However, they cannot do anything to prevent the appointee from taking the job.

Learn more about the topic here:

https://brainly.com/question/2135768?referrer=searchResults