Respuesta :
The fill-in-block to this question can be defined as follows:
Primary
Statutes
Congress
Legislatures.
Secondary
Precedent.
Case Law.
Stare Decisis.
Binding
California courts.
Will not
Explanation of the fill-in-block:
- The court in California should first consider main sources of law or law-making sources to decide whether to dismiss the lawsuit.
- The Statutes passed by the United States Congress and the State Legislatures are another resource for the court.
- Where there is no source of law for the court to decide to dismiss the case, the court should then look to secondary sources of law.
- If indeed the Court of California uses original court opinions to see whether the complaint was to be rejected, it is looking for just a precedent.
- Previous court views are called the Case Law system.
- The California Court should adopt the US Supreme Court decision just on the Stare Decision concept.
- California courts shall be binding on the United States Supreme Court ruling.
- The California court would not execute this provision of the agreement because of the U.S. Supreme Court judgment as well as the earlier cases in CA concerning such clauses.
Learn more:
brainly.com/question/12689329