In the case below, the original source material is given along with a sample of student work. Determine the type of plagiarism by clicking the appropriate radio button

STUDENT VERSION
The philosophical position known as constructivism views knowledge as a human construction. The various perspectives within constructivism are based on the premise that knowledge is not part of an objective, external reality that is separate from the individual. Instead, human knowledge, whether the bodies of content in public disciplines (such as mathematics or sociology) or knowledge of the individual learner; is a human construction.

References:
Gredler, M. E. (2001). Learning and instruction: Theory into practice (4th Ed.). Upper Saddle, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

ORIGINAL VERSION
"The philosophical position known as constructivism views knowledge as a human construction. The various perspectives within constructivism are based on the premise that knowledge is not part of an objective, external reality that is separate from the individual. Instead, human knowledge is a human construction" (p. 29).

Which of the following is true for the Student Version above?

(A) Word-for-Word plagiarism
(B) Paraphrasing plagiarism
(C) This is not plagiarism

This two versions are quite similar, the student's version takes sentences from the original version and place them in the same way, and even when there are some small pieces of information omitted or little changes in punctuation, it does not present the correct use of paraphrasing, there are reference but the lines are not written between quotation marks.

Answer Link