A typical loaded commercial jet airplane has an inertia of 2.1 × 105 kg (a) Which do you expect to require more energy: getting the plane up to cruising speed or getting it up to cruising altitude? Will one be a lot more than the other or will they be comparable? (b) How much energy does it take to get the plane to a cruising speed of 270 m/s? (c) How much energy does it take to get the plane to a cruising altitude of 10.4 km? [Ignore dissipation.]

Respuesta :

Answer:

(a) It depends on what cruising speed and cruising altitude

(b) [tex] 7654.5 * 10^6 (J)[/tex]

(c) [tex] 21425.04 * 10^6 (J) [/tex]

Explanation:

Formula for Kinetic energy: [tex] E_k = \frac{mv^2}{2}[/tex]

Formula for Potential energy [tex] E_p = mgh [/tex]

(a) It actually depends on cruising speed and cruising altitude to tell which one requires more energy. However, cruising speed would have more impact than cruising altitude because it has a power of 2 in the energy formula.

(b) If we plug in v = 270 and m = 210000 to the Kinetic energy formula we should have

[tex] E_k = \frac{210000 * 270^2}{2} = 7654.5 * 10^6 (J)[/tex]

(c) If we plug in h = 10.4 km = 10400 m, m = 210000 and g = 9.81 we should have

[tex] E_p = 210000 * 9.81 * 10400 = 21425.04 * 10^6 (J) [/tex]