Which of the following most logically completes the argument below?
When mercury-vapor streetlights are used in areas inhabited by insect-eating bats, the bats feed almost exclusively around the lights, because the lights attract flying insects. In Greenville, the mercury-vapor streetlights are about to be replaced with energy-saving sodium streetlights, which do not attract insects. This change is likely to result in a drop in the population of insect-eating bats in Greenville, since __________.
(A) the bats do not begin to hunt until after sundown.
(B) the bats are unlikely to feed on insects that do not fly.
(C) the highway department will be able to replace mercury-vapor streetlights with sodium streetlights within a relatively short time and without disrupting the continuity of lighting at the locations of the streetlights.
(D) in the absence of local concentrations of the flying insects on which bats feed, the bats expend much more energy on hunting for food, requiring much larger quantities of insects to sustain each bat.
(E) bats use echolocation to catch insects and therefore gain no advantage from the fact that insects flying in the vicinity of streetlights are visible at night.

Respuesta :

Pot8o

Answer:

The answer is D) in the absence of local concentrations of the flying insects on which bats feed, the bats expend much more energy on hunting for food, requiring much larger quantities of insects to sustain each bat.

Explanation:

The likely population drop after the change in streetlights would be because it would be harder for bats to find they prey, so they would need to expend more resources (energy) in doing so, and for that they would consume more insects than before.

This would likely decrease the population of insects so with less food available the city would most likely not be able to sustain the same bat population.