Which detail reveals the writer’s purpose? Using first-person pronouns shows that the writer has strong opinions against the lottery. Placing “state leaders” in quotation marks indicates that the writer is mocking the lawmakers. Stating the reason for the bill highlights the writer’s anger over the potential change. Comparing the lottery to gambling establishes factual evidence to back the writer’s opinion.

Respuesta :

Answer:

Placing “state leaders” in quotation marks indicates that the writer is mocking the lawmakers.

Explanation:

I believe that this is the correct answer because it shows that the writer has a strong stance on the subject, possibly to the point of a bias.

Speaker demonstrates his dissatisfaction with the decision to repeal the law prohibiting the sale of lottery tickets on Sundays by quoting state authorities. Option B or (ii) is the correct answer.

What is the writer's purpose and mood?

Option B is the correct answer because it demonstrates that the writer has a strong opinion on the subject, possibly to the point of bias.

The writer is insulting the legislators by putting "state leaders" in quotation marks.

Option A relates to pronouns in the first person. However, no first-person pronouns are used. As a result, this choice is incorrect. Option C is inaccurate since it alludes to the speaker's rage.

There is no factual data to support Option D's comparison of the lottery to gambling. Option B is, therefore, the correct choice.

For more information about the writer's purpose, refer below

https://brainly.com/question/25024703