Respuesta :
Answer:
- Mr. Utterson the lawyer was a man of a rugged countenance that was never lighted by a smile . . .
- He was austere with himself . . .
- No doubt the feat was easy to Mr. Utterson; for he was undemonstrative at the best . . .
Explanation:
was a man of a rugged countenance, was austere with himself, was undemonstrative at the best - these are examples of direct characterization.
The other options are wrong.
- “Indeed?” said Mr. Utterson, with a slight change of voice, “and what was that?” This option is wrong because a slight change of voice is indirect characterization.
- Mr. Utterson again walked some way in silence and obviously under a weight of consideration. This option is wrong because in silence and obviously under a weight of consideration is indirect characterization.
- It was a man of a rugged countenance, that it was austere with himself, and also that it was undemonstrative at the best so that these are examples of direct characterization.
Also, thus The other options are wrong.
- According to - “Indeed?” said Mr. Utterson, with a slight change of the voice, also “and what was that?” so that This is the wrong option just because of the slight chance of the voice is indirect characterization.
- Although this statement- Mr. Utterson is again to the walked are some way in silence and also that it obviously under a weight of consideration. Also that This is the wrong option just because in the silence and but that is obviously under a weight of consideration is indirect of the characterization.
Learn more about:
https://brainly.com/question/15808388